Month: April 2025

The new Areas dashboard in Home Assistant

by

Last week saw the release of Home Assistant 2025.4, and with it, a new type of dashboard called Areas. This is an automatic dashboard, managed by Home Assistant itself, which displays your devices sorted by room, or ‘area’. At present, it’s ‘experimental’, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it becomes the default in future.

The default dashboard in Home Assistant is also automatically managed, but if you have more than a few devices and integrations, it can quickly become overwhelming. Therefore, my default dashboard is one that I manage myself. I can decide what to show, and in what order. However, it’s taken me quite some time to build and tweak that dashboard, and at one point I had almost 30 different cards showing. I’ve reduced that somewhat, and now use badges to highlight information that I need to know, but it still represents a significant investment of my time.

The new Areas dashboard therefore sits somewhere in the middle. The first tab shows an overview of your home, with sections for each ‘area’ that you have defined in Home Assistant. Most people will make each room an area, but it’s up to you – you may define parts of a room as a distinct area, for example. Personally, I’ve gone down the room = area paradigm, but I also have areas for ‘roof’ (where the solar panels are) and ‘outside’.

Setting up your home’s areas

You can set up your home’s Areas in the Settings pane in Home Assistant. When you do so, you can also specify any entities that represent the temperature and humidity in that room. This is useful, as these entities will then show up on your Areas dashboard.

Once you have defined your areas, you’ll need to add your devices to these areas. Again, in Settings, navigate to the Devices section. You can sort your devices by Area, so you’ll be able to see which ones are not allocated. Some of these ‘devices’ will represent virtual things, like HACS integrations or web services, so you don’t necessarily need to allocate these to a room.

A screenshot of the Home Assistant interface showing the options when adding a dashboard, including the new Areas dashboard

Adding the Areas dashboard

Again in Settings, you’ll need to open the Dashboards pane. Here you’ll typically see three dashboards there already. These will include your current default dashboard, the built-in energy dashboard and the built-in Map dashboard. At the bottom right, click ‘Add Dashboard’, and choose ‘Areas (experimental)’. Give it a title and an icon, and then enable to show in your sidebar. Once done, you’ll be able to access it at any time from the side bar.

Initially, every area that you have defined will have a section and a tab along the top. If you click the Pencil icon at the top right to edit, you can re-order the areas, and also make any invisible. You may want to do this if the dashboard doesn’t show anything useful for that particular area. If you click into each area, you can also hide any devices that you don’t want to see on the dashboard. For example, in my screenshot, each programme on my Bosch dishwasher shows as an individual entity; I can therefore hide all of those apart from the dishwasher’s power status if I want to.

The areas dashboard is still experimental

We’re only a week on from this feature having been made available in Home Assistant, and so it’s still ‘experimental’. In particular, you’ll only see a handful of devices on this dashboard. In my case, this includes lights, sockets, my dishwasher, my TV, media players, and thermostats.

But it’s a lot easier to set up and manage than it would to create a new dashboard from scratch. And it’s less overwhelming than the other default managed dashboard, which shows a huge amount of data. As time goes on, I hope that the Areas dashboard is developed further and becomes the new default. It’ll make Home Assistant feel more like other smart home apps like Google Home, and make it easier for new users to manage.

How to save money with gift cards

by

Back in December 2023, I wrote about why you shouldn’t give gift cards as presents in the run-up to Christmas. I still stand by that, but wanted to expand on the last section of that post about when it is appropriate to buy gift cards. Because, it turns out, buying gift cards can actually save you money.

This is all about exploiting the difference between the actual cost of gift cards, and their value. Go to any supermarket, and there’s usually a display at the end of an aisle full of gift cards for various other shops, restaurants, cinema chains, subscription services and the like. When you buy one of those cards, a small percentage of what you pay goes to the shop (otherwise they’d be selling them at cost price). To give an example, when you buy a £10 gift card, 50p of that £10 may be kept by the shop, and the gift card supplier gets £9.50.

What we can therefore do is find places that, instead of pocketing that 50p, they pass some of that on to you as a saving. It’s a bit like cashback sites like Quidco (referral link), where they share some of the money they get as commission with you. I’ve listed a few options below:

Pluxee and other employer schemes

I work for an employer who is signed up to Pluxee. This means that I can buy online gift cards, usually at a 3-5% discount, for many stores. The ‘big four’ supermarkets are included, as are the likes of M&S, Boots, and many online retailers. It also handily keeps track of how much money I’ve saved – we’ve had it for close to ten years now and collectively I’ve saved over £100.

You can use it for big ticket items – back in 2020, I bought our LG TV mostly using Curry’s vouchers. At the time, the discount was 8% (I think) and at present it’s 6%. Ultimately it knocked around £25 off the cost of the TV.

The big advantage of Pluxee is that you can buy the gift cards and be able to use them almost straight-away. So, say you’re in a supermarket, and you’ve used one of those handheld scan and ship gizmos, so that you know exactly how much your shopping will cost. You can then quickly buy a gift card for that amount, go to the checkout, and use it to pay for your shopping.

Costco

Another place to buy gift cards at a discount is Costco (something I didn’t mention in my overview last year). As with most things from Costco, you have to buy in bulk. For example, you can buy five £20 Pizza Express gift cards, collectively worth £100, for £85 – that’s a 15% discount, and better than the 7% I get with Pluxee. You can buy the cards both in-store and online, and the online prices include postage.

Bear in mind that these are physical gift cards, and so you will need to actually buy them from the shop, or wait for them to come in the post. You can’t just buy one whilst waiting for your bill in a restaurant, for example. And you’ll need to be a Costco member to take advantage.

Sprive

I did a more detailed overview of Sprive last April. Sprive is an app for managing mortgage over-payments, but it includes a feature called Sprive Rewards for buying gift cards. It works in a similar way to Pluxee, except that the discount goes towards over-paying your mortgage. So, for example, if you buy a £10 M&S voucher through Sprive, it’ll still cost you £10, but Sprive will add another 40p onto your next mortgage over-payment for you.

The discount rates on Sprive tend to be lower than other apps – most supermarkets are only 2.5% for example. But it’s also the only place I’ve seen that offers Amazon gift cards, albeit at only 1%. However, one could argue that, because the savings are taken off your mortgage, you’ll save more in the long run due to lower interest payments.

If you do decide to sign up to Sprive, use my referral code HTWH65PM for an additional £5 off your mortgage. Incidentally, in the year since I originally wrote about Sprive, we now own 63% of our home, up from 55%.

Obviously, Sprive is only of use if you have a mortgage, Pluxee is only available to people who work for certain employers, and Costco also requires a membership. So, for everyone else, there’s Snip:

Snip

If none of the above options are available for you, then you may wish to consider Snip. I haven’t used it myself, but it allows you to buy gift cards in a similar way to Pluxee. The catch is that there is a monthly (£3) or annual (£30) membership fee. Now, if you use Snip regularly, you will easily save more than the monthly membership fee – assuming that a typical supermarket gift card has a discount rate of 4%, then one £75 shop per month would be enough to cover the fee.

Whilst savings of 3-5% may not seem like much, they do add up over time. This is why I like the tracker on Pluxee – saving a few pence here and there may not seem like much, but over the course of a year, it’s enough to pay for a trip to a cinema and a restaurant (which you could probably also pay for with gift cards). I will admit that it’s also a bit of a faff – I remember spending ages at a self-checkout in Ikea trying to get a voucher for 5% off, and struggling to get the payment to go through. It would be nice if things were just cheaper, rather than having to use workarounds like these.

A Minecraft Movie review

by
An image of the poster for A Minecraft Movie, showing the five main characters.

You’re probably aware that A Minecraft Movie is out, considering the absolute juggernaut of publicity behind it. And seeing as our nine-year-old is obsessed with Minecraft, we inevitably went to see it yesterday.

My verdict: it’s basically fine. Three stars out of five.

Our nine-year-old loved it. They have played some Minecraft at home, and watched many hours of other people playing Minecraft on YouTube. I guess you would get more out of this film if you are familiar with the game, judging by the cheers from fellow members of the audience every time some kind of iconic item from the game was featured in the film. We went to see it at our local Vue in Halifax, and the screen was pretty much full. I guess that’s something to do with it only having opened on Friday in the UK.

There’s a series of scenes before the opening credits where we’re introduced to Jack Black‘s character, Steve, and the ‘Overworld’ which is the blocky Minecraft world. Then we return to the real world to be introduced to Jason Momoa‘s character during the opening credits. Indeed, the first part of the film spends quite a bit of time in the ‘real world’ before we’re back into the blockiness. It’s probably a good thing that the Overworld is featured so early, as it doesn’t come up again for a little while.

The plot is, well, a bit meh. Jack Black is peak Jack Black in this, and Jason Mamoa (also a producer of the film) does well, but the rest of the characters could do with more depth. It’s perhaps ironic that a film about a world-building game, doesn’t itself have enough world-building, in my opinion.

Ultimately though, this film will do well because it’s about Minecraft, and there’s just enough fan service to get players of the game on board. If you’re not familiar with the game, and don’t have kids, then maybe wait for it to come out on streaming.

No more Google Assistant on Fitbit Versa 3

by
A screenshot of an email from Google Fitbit. It says: You are receiving this email to let you know about an upcoming change to your Fitbit Sense and/or Versa 3. Over the next few weeks we will be progressively phasing out Google Assistant on your Fitbit device. You can learn more about this process here. This change means that Google Assistant voice control for activities will no longer be available on your Fitbit device.

In a few weeks time, Google is removing support for Google Assistant on its Fitbit Versa 3 and Sense devices. I have a Fitbit Versa 3, and so last week I received an email (screenshotted above) notifying me. Going forward, if you have a Fitbit Versa 3 or Fitbit Sense, you’ll only be able to use Amazon Alexa and not Google Assistant.

When I first heard about this, I was a little confused. After all, with Google now owning Fitbit, you would expect them to phase out support for Alexa to keep you in Google’s ecosystem. So, I did a bit of digging.

Alexa on Fitbit has always supported more features

Firstly, Google Assistant has been a poor relation of Alexa on Fitbit devices. On a Fitbit, Alexa can do most things that an Amazon Echo device can do, including controlling smart home devices. Google Assistant was more limited, to things like web searches, or launching apps on the Fitbit device to set timers or start exercises.

I’ve had my Fitbit Versa 3 for nearly three years – it was a 38th birthday present from Christine – and in that time I’ve only ever used Google Assistant. Following this announcement, I switched to Alexa, and have so far found it more capable. We don’t use any other Alexa devices at home, and so I’ve had to link up our various smart home devices to Alexa son that I can interact with them. For the most part, I’ve used Home Assistant and Homeway to achieve this.

Google is ‘upgrading’ Assistant to Gemini

You’re probably aware of Google Gemini, which is Google’s AI chat bot. Later this year, Gemini will replace the Google Assistant mobile app, as Google wants to foist its AI tools on its existing Google Assistant users. I’m not extremely comfortable with this, as I believe that current AI models are flawed and inefficient. For example, last year Gemini told people to eat one rock per day, and I’m concerned with the amount of computing power these AI models need compared to more basic natural language parsing. But I guess I don’t have a choice unless I stop using Google Assistant altogether.

Anyway, it seems that Google has decided that its older devices won’t be getting the Gemini upgrade. When you use Google Assistant on a Fitbit Versa 3, it communicates with the Google Assistant on your paired phone by Bluetooth. Presumably then, once the Google Assistant app has disappeared from app stores, it won’t be able to work. Google no longer sells the Versa 3 and Sense, and so I’m guessing they’ve made a business decision not to support the Gemini upgrade. After all, unless you’re a Fitbit Premium or Google One subscriber, you’re not making any more money for Google after having bought the device.

For now, the newer Fitbit Versa 4 and Sense 2 should still work with Google Assistant – these models are still on sale at the time of writing. However, they’re being phased out – in future, Google will only sell the Inspire and Charge Fitbit ranges. If you want a smart watch, you’ll be steered towards Google’s Pixel Watch range – but bear in mind that they’re Android-only.

As for my Fitbit Versa 3? Hopefully it’ll keep going for at least a couple more years, and I’m happy with using Alexa instead of Google Assistant for now. When it comes to replacing it, however, I’ll need to think hard about my choices. Whilst Fitbit’s smart watch range is less capable than, say, an Apple Watch, they offer much better battery life. An Apple Watch Ultra typically lasts only 36 hours, whereas the Versa 3 would do five days on a full charge when I bought it. Even now, it still manages 3-4 days, depending on use.

How to: Make Bluesky more manageable

by
A screenshot of Blueksy's moderation settings

This is the latest in an occasional series of how to get the most out of Bluesky, my preferred social network. In previous blog posts, I’ve talked about using labellers, displaying your pronouns, following Mastodon accounts using Bridgy Fed and importing contacts from Twitter/X, and today, I’m going to write about how I ensure that Bluesky isn’t too overwhelming for me.

Custom feeds

By default, new users to Bluesky get three feeds: Following, Discover and Popular with Friends. Following is the default, and shows you everything posted by the user accounts that you follow. It’s the feed that most people use. But one unique feature to Bluesky is what was known as ‘choose your own algorithm‘ in the form of Custom Feeds.

At the time of writing, I follow 220 accounts on Bluesky. Sure, some post more than others, but if I’m particularly busy, it can be a lot of content to catch up on. I therefore use a custom feed called OnlyPosts, which hides replies and reposts – in other words, it only shows regular posts and quote posts from your Following feed. If I don’t have a lot of time to catch up on activity on Bluesky, then the OnlyPosts feed means I can get up-to-date more quickly.

There’s another custom feed from the same user called Mutuals, which only shows posts from the users you follow who also follow you back. Whilst this may reinforce an echo chamber, it makes Bluesky a little more like the Friends feed on Facebook where there’s a reciprocal relationship with the people you’re following.

To follow a custom feed, follow the link, and then click the ‘+ Follow’ button on the profile. It’ll then appear as a tab on your Blueksy home page.

Moderation lists

I follow around 20 moderation lists. These are lists curated by other users, allowing you to mute or block people en masse. This gets rid of some of the noise from people that you’re never going to agree with, making it a more pleasant experience. Using block lists like this used to be possible on Twitter, using tools like Block Together, and so it’s good to have this on Bluesky as well.

I won’t list all of the lists that I use, but here are some key ones:

You can either block or mute all accounts on these lists.

Muting hashtags and keywords

I currently have words like ‘Trump’, ‘Vance’ and ‘Musk’ muted, so even if people I follow post about them, they won’t show up in my feeds. I’ve also muted a number of sport-related hashtags as such things don’t interest me, and keywords for several TV shows that I don’t watch. Most social networks have such a feature, but it’s worth a reminder that Bluesky has it too.

Muting using labels

You can also use labels to hide posts. For example, I follow the Engagement Hacks Labeler, but rather than simply adding a label to posts, I just hide them altogether.

By using all of the above tools, I have a more curated Bluesky experience that isn’t just endless doomscrolling, or posts that don’t interest me.